Thinking Commercially in Media · Facilitator Guide
Pilot Copy - Aug 2026

Facilitator Guide

© Tau, a Taylor's Education Group company. Confidential & proprietary — for learners/instructor use only; not for external distribution or reproduction without permission.
Say This
Debrief/Discussion Question
Sample Response
Faci Notes
Deck slide reference

Programme Overview

240 min total

Programme-Level Learning Objectives

  • Describe the media industry value chain and where Astro plays in it
  • Identify key commercial metrics media companies use to track commercial health
  • Connect your role to Astro's cost drivers, revenue enablers, and commercial metrics
  • Generate ideas and voice commitments to strengthen key commercial metrics

Agenda & Flow

#TimingAgenda ItemSection-Level ObjectivesMaterials
20 minOpening
  • Name instructor and classmates
  • Feel warmed up
  • Clear sense of agenda/objectives
1100 minSection 1 — "In the CEO's Chair"
  • Building a bigger picture view of the media landscape
  • Describe 5 companies' business models/bets/threats
  • Place them on the value chain
  • Draw parallels to Astro
10 minBreak Self-paced Value Map dot placement happens here — see Section 1
260 minSection 2 — "Metrics That Matter"
  • Define 8 core commercial metrics across 3 lifecycle buckets
  • Explain tracking/calculation of the metrics
  • Articulate why they matter
  • Discuss which metrics matter most to Astro
345 minSection 3 — "Moving The Metrics"
  • Identify which metric your role affects
  • Visualise cross-role impact
  • Propose an action to move the metrics
  • Evaluate peers' proposals
15 minClosing
  • Recall the day's throughline across all 3 sections
  • Commit publicly to one action to think commercially / act like a CEO
Total runtime: 240 min (4 hours)

Opening

20 min

Section Objectives

  • Name instructor and classmates
  • Feel warmed up
  • Clear sense of agenda/objectives

Materials Needed

Instructor Intro → Slide 1
5 min

No fixed script — introduce yourself, establish credibility, and frame why this day matters ("thinking like a CEO," why media, why now).

Icebreaker → Slide 3
5 min
Say This

"Find someone from a different department. For 60 seconds each: discuss one piece of media you genuinely enjoyed this week — and why."

Faci Notes
  • Deliberately "enjoyed," not "consumed" — forces a small opinion and a reason, a lower-stakes rehearsal for the judgment-with-reasoning participants will need later in the CEO Interviews and Astro Debrief.
  • Keep tight (self-limiting by design); pairs should cross departments since the room is mixed.
Pre-Work Callback → Slide 4
5 min
Say This — callback prompt (from pre-work)

"If you were Astro's CEO today, what would keep you up at night?"

Read 2–3 anonymised, pre-selected standout submissions, then open the floor for 1–2 volunteers if time allows.

Say This

"Hold onto your answer — you'll come back to this question later today, after exploring five different companies who are industry leaders in media."

Faci Notes
  • Pre-work's own 3 check-for-understanding questions are self-graded async — no live quiz needed.
Learning Objectives & Agenda → Slide 5
5 min

Present programme-level learning objectives and the agenda (Section 1 – 2 – 3 – Closing, with timings).

Say This

"Are there any parts here that you're particularly excited about?"

Faci Notes
  • Ensure there is understanding and excitement among participants on why they are in this programme and what they stand to gain.

Section 1 — "In the CEO's Chair"

100 min

Section Objectives (Supports LO1)

  • Building a bigger picture view of the media landscape
  • Describe 5 companies' business models/bets/threats
  • Place them on the value chain
  • Draw parallels to Astro

Materials Needed

Section Divider → Slide 6

Transition slide — no script, advance straight into 1A.

1A · Group Research / Prep → Slide 7
20 min

Groups of 4–5, one company each (Netflix, A24, Viu, Sky, iHeartRadio), self-paced through the case pack (brief, headline collage, article, video QR codes, prop). Group selects its own spokesperson.

Say This

"Use the CEO Interview questions as your prep guide — get to know your company well enough to improvise, not memorise. You'll be interviewed live and the room will ask follow-ups."

Faci Notes
  • Circulate; redirect content questions back to the case pack rather than answering directly.
1A · CEO Interview (live, ~6 min/company) → Slide 8
30 min
Say This — 7 questions across 3 blocks
BlockPrompt
Company Snapshot"When and where were you founded, and how has your business model evolved?" / "What's your scale today?" / "What do you sell and who pays for it? Largest cost drivers?"
Strategic Direction"What's the one number you'd watch every week?" / "What's your biggest strategic bet right now?" / "What's the biggest threat to your position?"
The CEO's Seat"What keeps you up at night?"
Sample Response — Netflix
  • 325M+ paid memberships, Q1 2026 revenue $12.25B (+16% YoY); FY2026 guidance $50.7–51.7B
  • Watches ad-tier growth (250M+ global MAU); largest cost driver is content spend (~$20B in 2026)
  • Biggest bet: monetising the existing subscriber base harder — ads + live programming (70+ live titles this quarter)
  • Threat: Netflix's own CEO calls YouTube a "straightforward competitor" for attention
Sample Response — A24
  • $2.5B valuation, ~$300M revenue
  • Watches opening-weekend box office/critical reception; largest cost driver is production budgets, deliberately kept modest per title to protect the model
  • Biggest bet: DTC (AAA24 app, merch) plus $75M Google/DeepMind AI investment
  • Threat: rising production costs, compressing theatrical windows
Sample Response — Viu
  • 15.5M paid subscribers (+17% YoY, FY2024), freemium/AVOD — ~90% of PCCW's OTT revenue
  • Watches paid-sub growth in fastest markets (Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia) + microdrama crossover (~20%); largest cost driver is licensing Korean and Chinese content
  • Biggest bet: June 2026 cross-regional streaming bundle with iQIYI International
  • Threat: global platforms with far larger content budgets than Viu could ever match
Sample Response — Sky, UK
  • £10.3B FY2024 revenue (pre-tax profit £253M); narrowed from 6 countries to 3 (UK, Ireland, Italy), exiting Germany/Austria/Switzerland
  • Watches streaming-hardware adoption weekly (Sky Glass/Sky Stream — already 90%); largest cost drivers are content/sports rights and the ongoing Sky Glass/Sky Stream hardware rollout
  • Biggest bet: defending its role as bundler of choice — adding ITV's channels/streaming service on top of Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max already inside its "Ultimate" plan
  • Threat: global streamers selling direct to UK consumers without needing a bundler at all
Sample Response — iHeartRadio
  • 870+ stations, 278M monthly listeners, Q1 2026 revenue $884M
  • Watches podcast downloads/digital ad revenue (+27% YoY); largest cost driver is maintaining and monetising a nationwide terrestrial broadcast footprint
  • Biggest bet: Netflix video podcast deal, programmatic ad expansion
  • Threat: on-demand streaming audio (Spotify, Apple Music) eating attention and ad share for over a decade

Invite the room to ask as fellow CEOs in the same space — as a competitor, someone who'd emulate this company, or a potential partner.

Faci Notes — fielding questions & keeping time
  • Open the floor with: "I'll take two questions from the floor."
  • Rep may say "I don't know, but my hypothesis is..." rather than guess as fact — model this at the start of the day.
  • Hold the 2-question cap firm regardless of room energy.
1A · Full-Group Debrief → Slide 9
5 min

Purpose: participants begin drawing out the value-chain characteristics (aggregation vs. content creation, asset-light vs. vertically integrated, legacy vs. digital-native) that the room will formalise in 1B's mapping exercise next.

Say This

"Looking across all five companies — what similarities did you notice? What differences stood out?"

Sample Response — listen for
  • Netflix/Viu overlap (aggregate + DTC)
  • Asset-light (Viu) vs. vertically integrated (Sky)
  • Structural parallel between Sky and iHeartRadio — both legacy incumbents transforming their own business models to stay relevant
1B · Value Chain — Reveal & Map → Slide 10
20 min

Reveal the framework (5 min). Narration, not discussion — click through the layers one at a time, in order:

LayerContent
1 · ZonesContent Creation → Aggregation → Distribution (Traditional Pipe / OTT-DTC), 2 cross-cutting bands (Advertising & Monetisation, Data & Tech), parallel Radio lane (AM/FM Radio → DTC Apps)
2 · Win conditionsClick through per zone, including the Radio lane and cross-cutting bands
3 · Examples (generic)Local/regional/international examples excluding the 5 studied companies and Astro
4 · Case studiesThe 5 studied companies (Netflix, A24, Viu, Sky, iHeartRadio) — gated by an on-screen popup
5 · AstroAstro's own footprint across the map — the final click, also gated by an on-screen popup
Faci Notes
  • This is a gradual, click-by-click reveal — pace it so the room can draw connections back to the case studies they explored in 1A as each layer appears, rather than clicking through quickly.
  • Before Layers 4 and 5, the slide itself pauses on a popup ("Where would the case companies we explored fall on this map?" / "Where would Astro fall on this map?"). This is the cue to have learners physically place the case companies and Astro on the wall chart themselves before clicking "Done!" — the digital reveal confirms what's already on the wall, it isn't the first time the room sees the answer.

Map the companies (10 min). Each spokesperson places their company card on the zone(s) they believe it occupies, justified by their own findings — not facilitator-assigned.

Say This

"You said [X] is your company's edge — where does that put you on this map, and why?"

Sample placements — all 5 companies
Sample Response
  • Netflix: "We're placing ourselves in Content Creation AND Aggregation AND Direct-to-Consumer — we license other studios' content, make our own, and go straight to the subscriber without anyone else's pipe."
  • A24: "We're Content Creation only. We don't aggregate anyone else's work, we don't own any distribution pipe, and we license our finished films to platforms like HBO Max rather than going direct to consumer ourselves."
  • Viu: "We sit in Aggregation and Direct-to-Consumer — we license Korean and regional content, bundle it into one app, and go straight to the subscriber. But we don't own any pipe."
  • Sky: "We're in Aggregation AND Distribution 3a — we bundle channels and content, and we own the actual satellite and broadband pipe that delivers it."
  • iHeartRadio: "We sit in AM/FM Radio — we make radio programming and own terrestrial broadcast reach directly, no intermediary — but we plug into Amazon's and Google's programmatic systems instead of owning our own ad infrastructure."
Say This

"Looking at the board — which two companies, despite operating in completely different markets or at completely different scale, are structurally fighting the same fight?"

Sample Response
  • "Netflix and Viu are actually doing the same thing — bundling content and going direct to the viewer. Netflix just does it with a much bigger budget and global content. Viu wins by being hyper-local instead."
Faci Notes
  • Prompt if needed: Netflix and Viu now visibly overlap in Aggregation + DTC — surface this if the room doesn't get there themselves.
  • Warm-up rep for the "structural, not scale" comparison the Astro debrief asks for next.

Identify Astro's zones (5 min). Reveal Astro's own footprint across the map — nearly the full chain plus the parallel radio track:

ZoneAstro entity
Advertising & MonetisationAstro Media Solutions (AMS)
IP Creation & OwnershipAstro Shaw
Production ServicesAstro Studios
AggregationAstro
Traditional PipeNJOI, MEASAT
OTT/DTCAstro GO/Sooka
AM/FM RadioAstro Audio (Era, Sinar, Hitz, Lite, Melody, Raaga & more)
DTC AppsSYOK
1B · Astro Debrief (Jigsaw Discussion) → Slide 11
15 min

Rebuilt as a Similar → Different → Lessons structure — a deliberate fix against an apples-to-apples trap, so the room reasons "what tension does X's position reveal that Astro also has to navigate," not "why isn't Astro like X."

Say This — framing, said out loud before the questions start

"Let's explore what perspective these other cases give us to understand Astro. These companies operate in completely different worlds — a global streaming giant, an indie studio, a regional aggregator, a UK pay-TV operator being restructured as we speak, a US terrestrial radio giant. None of them are Astro's peer on scale or market. But some of them are fighting fights that are structurally similar to Astro's, even at wildly different size. That's what we're looking for now — not 'why isn't Astro like X,' but 'what tension does X's position reveal that Astro also has to navigate, in Astro's own context.'"

Sample answers below are synthesised from the case packs — illustrative, not a script. The room's real answers should lead; use these only to sense-check whether the discussion is landing on structural insight or staying at scale-comparison.

Say This

"Which parts of these cases are structurally or strategically similar to Astro — regardless of size or market?"

Sample Response
  • Sky is the closest structural mirror (same zones as Astro)
  • Netflix is the "software half" without a physical pipe
  • Viu's hyper-local lever mirrors Astro Shaw/local channels
  • iHeartRadio's legacy-vs-on-demand pressure mirrors Astro Radio
  • A24 is the outlier — single-zone specialist, no platform
Say This

"Which parts are fundamentally different — and why does that matter for whether a lesson actually transfers?"

Sample Response
  • Sky's strategy is set by an external parent — doesn't transfer to Astro's own capital allocation
  • Netflix's $20B content spend is unreplicable
  • Viu's scale is closer to Astro's than Netflix's, so its lesson transfers better
  • iHeartRadio sits in US regulatory history, not Malaysia's
  • A24's scarcity model is the inverse of a vertically integrated incumbent, though the underlying discipline might transfer
Say This

"What lessons can we draw for Astro specifically?"

Faci Notes — facilitator-only steering if discussion stalls
  • This is one open question on the slide — the following are facilitator-only steering prompts, not a checklist to march through:
    • Do's, don'ts, grey areas, or open questions worth flagging?
    • Things Astro is doing well, or could do differently?
    • Risks — bridge: Sky's group just told us their own ownership structure was rewritten two days ago, a vertically integrated pay-TV company under real streaming pressure. Astro is integrated across almost the same number of zones Sky was — where's Astro most exposed to that same kind of pressure?
    • Missed opportunities — bridge: Viu and iQIYI just merged their content libraries to survive as mid-sized players. Astro competes with both — is there a bundling or partnership move on this map Astro hasn't made yet?
Say This

"What is the value of staying in business across multiple zones versus focusing on fewer? If you were Astro's CEO, which zones would you focus in, and why?"

Sample Response
  • Multi-zone value: capture value at every step, bundle rivals (Sky's position)
  • Cost: spreads capital thin against zone specialists
  • A24 is the sharpest argument for focusing
  • No single right answer — two defensible positions: double down on local content/distribution (the Viu argument) vs. deliberately retreat from the OTT arms race (the "focus" argument)
Say This

"If you were Astro's CEO, what would keep you up at night?"

Sample Response — six registers surface here
  • Other revenue streams on existing content (Netflix ad-tier parallel)
  • Capturing bundling value, not just offering distribution (Sky parallel)
  • Vertical integration as edge vs. exposure (A24 vs. Sky contrast)
  • Competing world-class within one zone if focusing
  • Watching the right disruptors, not just today's competitors (YouTube, microdrama, AI filmmaking)
  • How we'd measure if any of this is working at all
Faci Notes — explicit callback
  • Callback to Opening's pre-work question and each rep's company-CEO answer — the biggest a-ha lever of the day.
  • Follow with: "You answered this for your assigned company this morning. Now answer it for Astro — has seeing four other companies' versions of this fear changed your answer?"
Break — Value Map Dot Placement → Slide 12
10 min

Self-paced, no facilitator time required — participants place red/green dots on the wall-chart value map during the break. This feeds directly into Section 2's transition ("turn around and look at the chart behind you").

Section 2 — "Metrics That Matter"

60 min

Section Objectives (Supports LO2)

  • Define 8 core commercial metrics across 3 lifecycle buckets
  • Explain tracking/calculation of the metrics
  • Articulate why they matter
  • Discuss which metrics matter most to Astro

Materials Needed

Section Divider → Slide 13

Transition slide — delivered right after the break, before the content slide.

Transition — Value Map Callback → Slide 13–14
Say This

"Turn around and look at the chart behind you. That's this room's collective picture of where Astro's costs and revenue actually sit — built by you, during the break."

Say This

"Anything interesting jump out at you?"

Sample Response — listen for
  • Red/green imbalance
  • Concentration in one or two zones
Say This

"So how do we know these cost drivers and revenue enablers are actually worth it? You know it by tracking the numbers behind it. That's what we're doing next."

2A · Acquisition & Conversion → Slide 14
12 min

Standardised 2-question pattern for every metric (reduces cognitive load) — Q1: "Who's seen/tracked/familiar with this in your role or function?" Q2: "How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Say This — CAC

"Who's familiar with CAC in your role or function? How is it tracked, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Spend ÷ new customers acquired
  • Rising CAC signals a saturating market
  • Anchor: iHeartRadio's near-zero CAC (no sign-up funnel) vs. A24 (not a subscription business at all) — match the metric to the business model
Say This — Trial-to-Paid Conversion

"Who's seen a free trial or freemium tier convert — or fail to convert — to paid, in your own function? How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • % of trial/freemium users who convert to paying within a defined window
  • Slow conversion suggests time-to-value is too long; fast conversion suggests the free experience proves worth almost immediately
  • Anchor: Viu's freemium-to-premium path likely converts fast, since hyper-local content lets new users find something relevant right away
2B · Engagement & Retention → Slide 14
13 min
Say This — DAU/MAU

"Who tracks usage or daily engagement in their own work? How is DAU/MAU tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Daily Active Users ÷ Monthly Active Users, as a percentage
  • High ratio = habitual, "sticky" product; low ratio = occasional logins
  • Anchor: iHeartRadio's terrestrial reach is deeply habitual (commute listening) but doesn't translate cleanly into an app-based DAU/MAU figure
Say This — Watch Time & Engagement Depth

"Who tracks watch time or content completion in their own work? How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Total time spent engaging, plus % of content started that's finished (Content Completion Rate)
  • Tells us not just whether people show up, but whether content is compelling enough to hold attention
  • Anchor: iHeartRadio skews frequent-but-shallow (background listening); Netflix skews less frequent but deeper (binge-driven) — same metric, read differently by business model
Say This — Churn Rate

"Who's dealt with churn or cancellations in their own function? How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • % of subscribers who cancel over a given period
  • Persistently high churn undermines any efficiency gained earlier in the funnel, no matter how strong CAC or conversion looks
  • Anchor: Sky (ownership shakeup under streaming pressure) and Viu (two Southeast Asian streamers have already collapsed) both lived a churn story earlier today — pure callback, no new research needed
2C · Monetisation & Value → Slide 14
20 min
Say This — ARPU

"Who's used ARPU-type thinking? How is it tracked, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Revenue ÷ active users
  • Anchor: Sky's bundled ARPU (pay-TV + broadband + mobile) vs. Viu's volume/ad-driven model
Say This — LTV

"Who's used lifetime-value thinking? How is it tracked, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • ARPU × lifespan (or ÷ churn) — connects CAC to actual payback
  • Anchor: Netflix's durable LTV story vs. Sky's structural rewrite
Say This — Ad Attention

"Who's dealt with ad/media-buying measurement? How is it tracked, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Viewability, completion rate, attention-based scoring — not just impressions served
  • Anchor: iHeartRadio plugging into Amazon DSP/Google DV360, plus an AI brand-safety partner (Sounder)
Synthesis Debrief → Slide 15
15 min
Say This

"Which of these are more 'traditional' metrics and which are more recent?"

Sample Response
  • Established four: CAC, ARPU, LTV, Churn
  • Streaming-era additions: DAU-MAU, Watch Time, Ad Attention, Trial-to-Paid
Say This

"Do you think any bucket or metric is more important than the rest? Why?" / "What happens to a business if it loses sight of these metrics?" / "What other metrics do you think a CEO needs to track that we haven't covered?"

Sample Response
  • If content investment doesn't surface unprompted, ask: "What about a company whose whole business is making content — A24, or Astro Shaw?"
  • Sample prompt: "What about how much a movie actually makes back vs. what it cost? A24 lives and dies by that."
Say This — Beyond the Funnel

All 8 metrics are funnel metrics (get/keep/monetise one subscriber). Two contrast metrics, same 2-question pattern:

Say This — Content Spend Efficiency / Content ROI

"Who's dealt with content or production investment decisions in their own function? How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Revenue vs. production/licensing cost
  • A24's low-budget discipline vs. Netflix/Sky's much larger spend
Say This — Revenue Streams per Asset

"Who's seen the same piece of content monetised in more than one way in their own function? How is it tracked and calculated, and what does it tell us?"

Sample Response
  • Distinct monetisation channels per title
  • A24 licensing across theatrical/HBO Max/TV
  • Netflix layering its ad tier onto owned content
Say This — closing talking point

"We focused on these eight, plus the two content/asset metrics, because they're the most universal — every role touches acquisition, engagement, or monetisation. The rest are real but belong to specific functions."

Section 3 — "Moving The Metrics"

45 min

Section Objectives (Supports LO3, LO4)

  • Identify which metric your role affects
  • Visualise cross-role impact
  • Propose an action to move the metrics
  • Evaluate peers' proposals

Materials Needed

Section Divider → Slide 16

Transition slide — no script, advance straight into 3A.

3A · Reflection — I Impact This Metric By... → Slide 17
10 min
Say This

"Think back to the eight metrics — which one does your role most directly affect, and how?"

Sample Response — post-it (Colour 1): "I impact [metric] by doing [X]" → post to Metrics Board, correct bucket
  • "I impact Churn by doing follow-up calls with customers who complain about service quality."
  • "I impact ARPU by upselling add-on packages during installation visits."
  • "I impact DAU/MAU by curating the content on the Astro GO homepage."
Say This — light debrief (final ~2 min)

"Anyone surprised by which bucket they landed in?"

3B · Ideation — I Propose... → Slide 17
10 min
Say This

"Write two more post-its, in [Color 2]: 'I propose [X] to improve [metric].'"

Sample Response
  • Own bucket: "I propose a standard retention script for cancellation calls to improve Churn, so it doesn't depend on which agent picks up."
  • Different bucket: "I propose a push notification when a new episode drops in a series someone's already watching, to improve DAU/MAU."

First post-it: a metric your role already affects. Second post-it: a metric in a different bucket than the one you work in.

Faci Notes
  • Both are framed as proposals, not directives — participants are hypothesising, not instructing another function what to do.
3C · Gallery Walk & Dot Vote → Slide 17
15 min

3 groups, each starts at a different bucket; 5 min silent read + one dot vote (Colour 3) per station; rotate on timer.

Faci Notes
  • Every group visits all 3 buckets by the end — guarantees votes in every bucket for the share-out.

Facilitator circulates, notes the leading post-it per bucket for the debrief.

3D · Final Share-Out & Debrief → Slide 18
10 min

Facilitator shares the top-voted idea per bucket — quick reads, not per-bucket discussion.

Say This

"Which idea here is likely to lead to the greatest impact?" / "Which is most exciting?" / "Which is most feasible?" / "Which metric or bucket should Astro employees prioritise?"

Faci Notes
  • Deliberate bridge into Closing's commitment cards — participants draw commitment from an idea already on the wall.

Closing

15 min

Section Objectives (Supports LO4)

  • Recall the day's throughline across all 3 sections
  • Commit publicly to one action to think commercially / act like a CEO

Materials Needed

Section Divider → Slide 19

Transition slide — no script, advance straight into the recap.

Recap → Slide 20
4 min

Narrated arc, not discussion or LO recitation — click through the winding path as you speak:

  • "Before today even started, your pre-work walked you through the eras of disruption in media — broadcast, cable and satellite, digital, streaming, and now attention and AI."
  • "Then this morning, you sat in five different CEOs' chairs... and placed them, and Astro, on the value chain."
  • "Then we translated that map into numbers — eight metrics, in three buckets."
  • "And then you named the one metric your own role moves, and proposed something to change it."
  • "So in one morning, you went from industry outsider to owning a specific number in Astro's business. Now — what are you going to do about it?"
Reflection — Commitment Card → Slide 21
3 min
Say This

"Complete the sentence: 'I will act like a CEO by committing to ___.' Draw from your Section 3 post-its, or something broader."

Sample Responses — Commitment Card
  • Metric-specific: "I'll pitch the retention script idea to my manager this week."
  • Broader: "I'll scan our competitors' news every week, the way we did with the jigsaw."

Give one example of each register (metric-specific vs. broader) so the room understands the range. Cards are pre-printed with the stem to protect the 3-min window.

Share Out Your Commitment → Slide 21–22
8 min
Say This

"Stand, read your commitment, sit down. One sentence — no elaboration."

~19 sec/person across 25 participants. Note recurring themes while listening.

Say This — closing line

"Here's what I heard a lot of: [2–3 recurring themes]. Hold each other to it."

Instructor Timer
00:00